Wednesday, November 19, 2014

EXTRA CREDIT: INTEGRATED MEDIA

     I was present during the IMA MFA Program, and it began with a few words from the director of the program. One notable comment made was his comparison of the cafeteria to the experiences program; called the "glass cafĂ©", he expected a more extravagant room but still made great use of it for a successful event, much like in making projects where one expects everything there, but in the end he or she must do the best with what they have. After thanking people for organizing the event, Marty came to say a few words about public education becoming a burden and how this was once considered right. Jason Fox also spoke of the need for the democratization of documentary tools and appliances; he also mentioned the impact of documentaries as both statistical and as an easier tool for analyzing issues. The man of the hour however, was Brian Winston.
     Winston spoke of a documentary that expressed racism and discrimination through a small interview with a villager in the first few minutes. The shot zoomed into the face of the villager as he complained of pictures of his people taken by foreigners; they would make post cards with his village on it and they would in turn, be bought by their own villagers. He even mentioned how his own son sent him a post card of his own village. In addition, if they played the drums to play the drums, tourists would give them money regardless of their intentions to entertain.
     Documentaries such as these, are meant to educate the masses, but people tend not to care; by people, I mean the mainstream populace, producers, and whoever else may fund these film makers. Because of this, there is an increase of scripting and subjectivity in documentaries, according to Winston. Funding comes when a drama is produced and a "wow incident" occurs that glues people to the screen. Thus, documentaries make little money usually, with exceptions coming from Fahrenheit 911, making $120 million and coming in second place, a Penguin documentary garnering $40 million dollars less. There is a "jaded audience assumption" when it comes to documentaries that make funding come in less. 

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Audio Project

 
https://soundcloud.com/peruvianpuffpepper-1/audio-project

Interview with Mark on his experiences with being a member of his marching band throughout High School.

Friday, November 14, 2014

Sound Walk Assignment

I chose to walk around my neighborhood of Corona, Queens. As I was headed towards Flushing Meadow Park, I had to walk parallel to the highway and was immediately met with the sound of cars zooming past me in the opposite direction, one after the other. By the time I got to 108th and Horace Harding, I heard a lot of horn honking, and the voices of teenagers heading onto the Q88 bus. When I reached the park, the cars were no longer heard as the booming voices of children, their parents, handballs, baseballs and the wheels of bikes surrounded my ears. Surprisingly, there were a lot of people there despite the fall weather. Even though there were a lot of pigeons eating bread at one location, a zoo nearby and dogs being walked, it seemed as though every animal was silent. I then crossed a bridge that led to a much larger part of the park and it seemed empty. I heard the wind and just that for quite some time. I took a seat to relax and would hear some foot steps here and quicker footsteps there as some people decided to go for a jog. There weren't many interesting sounds until I got near the soccer fields; I could hear people yelling for the ball, the sound of it being kicked and scraping through the turf as it rolled to someone's feet. Once I passed that, my hour had ended and I reached a dirty pond where I heard geese on the side honking at each other (or whatever sound they make, because it certainly isn't a quack.) As I turned around and headed back home, I was met with the same sounds, only in reverse.

Friday, November 7, 2014

MOMI TOUR

     When I first heard we were going to the MOMI, I figured the tour would be much more uniformed and standard. I was pleasantly surprised to see it was more casual but an incredibly detailed space. It was more than just facts about film history and what is done today to portray certain moods or convey messages on screen. We had close contact with examples of these techniques and even hands on experience. It all started in their auditorium or stage room, which was already a cool part of the museum as the stage had an illusionary design with colorful (mostly blue) "spikes" coming together and giving a three dimensional feel. Once the actual tour began, we were on our way to the wall of photos.
      The tour guide explained these photos were actors (both male and female) of the past posed in certain manners that gave off a certain feeling; classic Hollywood actors like Charlie Chaplin and Judy Garland were posed in ways one may not recognize them, such as Chaplin without a mustache, hat nor cane. They also differed greatly from modern day photos of celebrities (which tend to be candid shots (aside from advertisements) because they are set up, and "storyboarded" so it comes out in a specific way. In addition, these photos in particular were shown to casting directors as well.
     We were then shown prosthetic masks used for characters like the Wookiee and The Mask in Star Wars and  The Mask; next to this were other prosthetics used aside from the face, such as Natalie Portman's scarred and scratched legs in The Black Swan and the designs for different stage scene setups like the Oompa Loompas' little playground in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. We were also shown costumes used in old movies and television shows to depict time and feeling as to the potential attitude of the character or where they are from.
      For a brief moment, we were shown vintage toys and memorabilia from Star Wars and Star Trek. Then came the history lessons of things we had learned in class in terms of the devices used to entertain the eyes with optical illusions and the early forms of cameras; I enjoyed seeing the use of light as an illusion to make things appear like a live sequence of events, such as a room with poles holding fake hands, a bird cage I believe and a little missile looking object going down. When the light was on, they just looked like parallel objects rotating, but when it turned off and a beam of light fluttered quickly on the objects, it looked like they were moving themselves and producing a motion as if they were alive.
     My favorite part were the interactive exhibits, such as creating a short film using the recordings of the movement of a small object on a background and putting it all together on a computer. The best part was being able to participate in an ADR process sampling when I worked with two other students to do the voice over of one of Babe the little pig's scenes where he cries about missing and wanting his mother. It was fun and an interesting lesson to learn.
     I felt the MOMI was great and the tour was fantastic; the only downfall was the short time we had with the tour guide. I highly recommend it as it is not only a learning experience, but an interestingly fun place to get a sense of film history and the different techniques used to make the audiences see something that isn't actually there.